Perio Reports Vol. 23 No. 8 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians.
Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge
of dental hygiene science.
|
Blood Group Secretor Status Influences Periodontitis
There are four human blood groups: O, A, B and AB.
Researchers have shown a difference in periodontal disease
experience depending on blood type. Within blood groups a
person might also be considered a secretor if they produce
blood group reactive substances and secrete them into saliva.
Blood group O secretes H antigen, groups A, B and AB
secrete A antigen, B antigen or A and B antigens. The blood
reactive antigens are found on the surface of mucins, erythrocytes
and other cells and cause selective adherence of bacteria
to tooth surfaces and thus biofilm formation.
Researchers at Jaipur Dental College in India evaluated a
group of 90 patients equally divided into three groups: periodontally
healthy, chronic gingivitis and chronic periodontitis.
They collected subgingival plaque samples, unstimulated
saliva and blood to determine if secretor status influenced
oral health.
Of this group, 44 were secretors and 46 were non-secretors.
The majority of secretors belonged to the healthy group,
while the majority of non-secretors belonged to the periodontitis
group. There were equal numbers of each in the gingivitis
group. Plaque and gingivitis scores were higher in the
non-secretor group compared to secretors.
Bacterial counts in both subgingival plaque samples and
saliva samples were higher for P. intermedia and P. gingivalis in
non-secretors. Blood group antigens secreted in the saliva
appear to inhibit bacterial aggregation and thus biofilm formation.
Secretors provide a protective effect that protects
against periodontal disease.
Clinical Implications: Based on these findings, it might be
important to learn the blood type and secretor status of
patients, since non-secretors are more prone to bacterial
accumulation and therefore periodontal disease.
Tabasum, S., Nayak, R.: Salivary Blood Group Antigens and
Microbial Flora. Int J Dent Hygiene 9: 117-121, 2011. |
Smoking Cessation Improves Perio Health
Tobacco is a significant health problem, estimated to
kill more than five million people per year and accounts for
one in 10 deaths worldwide. Smoking is a risk factor for
cancer, lung disease, cardiovascular disease and periodontal
disease. Smokers are two to seven times more likely to have
periodontal disease than non-smokers. Despite great efforts
at smoking cessation, many dental research studies report
only 10 to 20 percent success rates.
Researchers at the University of Sao Paulo in Sao Paulo,
Brazil evaluated the effects of smoking cessation on periodontal
parameters following non-surgical therapy. The
one-year study began with 93 subjects and finished with 52
subjects. Subjects all received thorough non-surgical therapy
and oral hygiene instructions over several appointments.
They were seen every three months for maintenance
visits and further smoking cessation counseling. The
smoking cessation program included four one-hour sessions,
scheduled weekly. The multidisciplinary team provided
information, counseling, nicotine replacement drugs
and motivational interviewing to establish individualized
programs to fit each person's needs and wants.
Thirty percent of the 52 subjects did quit smoking.
Although very disappointing to the researchers, this is
better than other studies have reported. Both quitters and
non-quitters showed improved oral health at one year. A
gain of 0.5mm in clinical attachment level was shown in
the quitter group compared to the non-quitters. In fact,
the non-quitters showed an increase in attachment loss at
three months, with no changes from baseline at six and
12 months.
Clinical Implications: Smoking cessation should be part
of periodontal therapy.
Rosa, E., Corraini, P., de Carvalho, V., Inoue, G., Gomes,
E., Lotufo, J., De Micheli, G., Pannuti, C.: A Prospective
12-Month Study of the Effect of Smoking Cessation on
Periodontal Clinical Parameters. J Clin Perio 38: 562-
571, 2011. |
Bacteria Remain After Full-mouth Extraction
Placing implants in a mouth with periodontally involved
teeth allows bacteria to move to the new implant sulcus.
Depending on the immune response, peri-implantitis might
or might not occur.
When bacterial culturing is used to determine the presence
or absence of bacteria in the mouth, it was reported that
full-mouth extraction leads to an eradication of periodontal
pathogens. When the pockets were gone, so were the periodontal
pathogens. With newer microbiologic techniques to
detect oral pathogens using DNA testing, reports suggest just
the opposite.
Researchers at Catholic University Leuven in Leuven,
Belgium used several methods to test for oral bacteria prior to
full-mouth extraction and after implant placement. They
selected 10 patients with advanced periodontitis. Half were
smokers, three were women, seven were men and they ranged
in age from 47 to 65 years. Bacterial samples were taken from
subgingival plaque, the tongue and saliva. Culturing and
DNA testing were both done.
The teeth were extracted and six months later
implants were placed. Three to six months later, abutments
were placed. Plaque samples and clinical indices
were measured at one and three weeks, and 12 months
after abutment placement.
Bacterial levels were high prior to tooth extractions. The
levels for the amount of bacteria were much lower after
implant placement, however the same bacteria were present.
Levels for two bacteria remained very similar throughout, Aa and Pi. The crevice around the implants was pristine to begin,
but within one week was colonized by all the usual suspects,
but in much fewer numbers, except for Aa.
Clinical Implications: Aa survives at established levels
even without teeth.
Quirynen, M., Van Assche, N.: Microbial Changes After Full-
Mouth Tooth Extraction, Followed by 2-Stage Implant
Placement. J Clin Perio 38: 5810589, 2011. |
Green Tea Decreases Acid Levels of Saliva and Plaque
Green tea contains bioactive compounds of the catechin
family, a group of flavonoids (phenolic compounds). Catechins
have anti-inflammatory, anticariogenic, antioxidant and antibacterial
properties.
Researchers at EL-Azhar University in
Cairo, Egypt evaluated the effects of rinsing
for five minutes with green tea extract on
salivary and plaque pH levels and S. mutans counts. Testing was done on a random sample
of 25 patients visiting the dental school
clinic, 13 males and 12 females ranging in
age from 21 to 46 years. Subjects received a
complete clinical exam and plaque and
saliva samples were taken. Bleeding scores
were calculated by passing a piece of unwaxed floss between
the teeth in the anterior region and the premolars (18 interproximal
sites).
The study protocol included several steps. First was a two-minute
rinse with 10 percent sucrose solution. Seven minutes
later, plaque and saliva samples were taken followed by a water
rinse. One hour later subjects rinsed with two percent green tea
for five minutes and then waited 20 minutes before rinsing
again with a 10 percent sucrose solution for two minutes. Seven
minutes after that, plaque and saliva samples
were taken.
After the first sucrose rinse, the pH
dropped from 7 to under 5. Following the
green tea rinse, the pH dropped from 7 to
6.5. S. mutans count increased after the
sucrose rinse and dropped after the green tea
rinse. Bleeding also reduced following the
green tea rinse.
Clinical Implications: Green tea extract
can be used in rinses and toothpaste to reduce bacteria and
maintain a neutral pH in the mouth.
Awadalla, H., Ragab, M., Bassuoni, M., Fayed, M., Abbas, M.: A
Pilot Study of the Role of Green Tea Use on Oral Health. Int J Dent
Hygiene 9: 110-116, 2011. |
20-year Prevention Program Works
Both caries and periodontal disease are bacterial infections, with many
other factors influencing who experiences these diseases. Genetics as well as
habits learned at home influence the future health or disease of children.
Clinicians in a Brazilian periodontal practice established a preventive program
for the children of their patients in an attempt to prevent caries and periodontal
disease. Parents were diagnosed with gingivitis (G), chronic
periodontitis (CP) or aggressive periodontitis (AP). Fifty children ages three to
13 years joined the program. The children had no caries and no evidence of
bone loss. They received oral hygiene instructions and maintenance visits every
six to 12 months, similar to their parents. Parents were instructed to perform
toothbrushing and flossing for children eight years old and younger. The children
were divided into three groups, based on their parent's periodontal diagnosis:
G, CP or AP.
A total of 30 children were still being seen 20 years later, 16 females and
14 males from 23 to 33 years of age. Recall intervals averaged six months.
There were no significant clinical differences between the three groups and
no gingivitis.
Sixty percent (18 children) experienced no dental caries, 10 percent (three
children) had one lesion, 3.5 percent (one child) had two lesions, 20 percent
(six children) had three lesions, and 6.5 percent (two children) had four lesions.
Seven of the total lesions were initial, not through the enamel and 16 were
through the enamel.
Clinical Implications: Oral hygiene instructions and regular maintenance
prevented gingivitis and bone loss in these children and helped more than
half the group prevent dental caries.
Chambrone, L.A., Chambrone, L.: Results of a 20-Year Oral Hygiene and
Prevention Programme on Caries and Periodontal Disease in Children Attended at
a Private Periodontal Practice. Int J Dent Hygiene 9: 155-158, 2011. |
Expensive Toothbrush No Better than Conventional
Three patient factors influence the effectiveness of manual toothbrushing: dexterity,
frequency and duration of brushing. A fourth factor is toothbrush design,
which is in a constant state of change by toothbrush companies wanting to sell more
toothbrushes at higher prices with new designs and bristle configuration.
Researchers at Ponta Grossa State University in Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
compared three toothbrushes in a group of 27 nine- to 10-year olds. Toothbrush 1
(Colgate Classic), the conventional toothbrush has straight bristles and straight bristle
tuft arrangement. Toothbrush 2 (Colgate Extra Clean) has bristles cut on different
planes, and all tufts are in straight alignment. Toothbrush 3 (Colgate 360
degree) has bristles on different planes and
bristle tufts are arranged in straight and
circular patterns.
For 21 days prior to starting the study,
all subjects brushed daily with Toothbrush
1 and Colgate fluoridated toothpaste
under supervision, but with no instructions.
In a cross-over study design, each
student brushed with all three toothbrush
designs, based on group assignment.
Ten students were assigned to each
test group and began the first 15-day
period of brushing with one of the three
brushes. This was followed by a seven-day
washout period with all children
using Toothbrush 1. This pattern was
followed for all three brushes. Plaque
and gingivitis levels were recorded at the
end of each 15-day test period.
No significant differences between the
three toothbrushes were seen. All three
toothbrushes showed similar plaque and
gingivitis scores.
Clinical
Implications: The conventional,
simple toothbrush design is as
effective as more expensive, complex
bristle designs.
Stroski, M., de "Souza Dal Maso, A.,
Wambier, L., Chibinski, A., Pochapski, M.,
Santos, F., Wambier, D.:Clinical Evaluation
of Three Toothbrush Models Tested by
Schoolchildren. Int J Dent Hygiene 9: 149-
154, 2011. |